Property-record monitoring with source-level transparency

Trust center

Trust is a data contract, not a badge.

Deed Theft Shield separates source availability, automated signals, human conclusions, evidence, and authorization so the interface cannot quietly blur them together.

Source truth

A source can be labeled live only when it is configured, verified, enabled, and successfully checked inside its service window.

Live source
Demonstration data
Manual review
Source unavailable
Monitoring disabled

Human judgment

Rules may flag a new filing for review. They cannot make a final fraud determination. Authorization requires a reviewer identity, rationale, evidence acknowledgment, and timestamp.

A match is a reason to review, not proof of fraud.

Operational safeguards

Evidence integrity

Source observations and uploaded evidence carry SHA-256 content hashes and append-only custody events.

Authorization boundary

Prepared notifications remain drafts until an authorized human verifies the case and recipient.

Failure visibility

Unavailable, disabled, unverified, and failed sources create explicit skipped or failed states—not simulated success.

Authoritative consumer guidance

Monitoring is not a literal title lock.

The Federal Trade Commission cautions that title-monitoring services do not lock a title or prevent every fraudulent transfer. People facing suspected identity theft can use the federal recovery process at IdentityTheft.gov. Deed Theft Shield reflects those boundaries in its product language and response workflow.